English 
Español 
Return to Asbestos BlogCancers almost always cast a formidable shadow over the medical and social aspects of our lives. However, mesothelioma stands out as a particularly insidious adversary. Recognized for its association with asbestos exposure, this aggressive malignancy has earned a notorious reputation for its lethality and challenges in early detection.
Mesothelioma, affecting the thin layer of tissue covering internal organs known as the mesothelium, is predominantly linked to inhaling asbestos fibers. Despite efforts to curb asbestos use, the disease’s long latency period, often spanning decades, contributes to delayed diagnoses.
Recent data reveals a concerning uptick in mesothelioma cases, especially in Alaska and Maine. This greatly emphasizes the pressing need for heightened awareness, research, and medical interventions. In this article, we will explore the prevalence of mesothelioma across the U.S., shedding light on the nuanced dimensions of mesothelioma’s impact, emphasizing the imperative for comprehensive understanding and proactive measures in preventing its spread.
Mesothelioma Statistics
1. Prevalence in Buildings
The pervasive use of asbestos in construction materials before the mid-1980s has left an enduring legacy in many cities across the U.S., where virtually every building erected during that period incorporated asbestos products. From roof shingles to adhesive, ceilings, walls, wiring, plumbing, and insulation, this toxic substance infiltrated various construction elements.
Despite subsequent asbestos bans, the ongoing presence of this hazardous material in many older buildings poses a persistent threat to occupants, highlighting the importance of comprehensive asbestos inspections and remediation efforts to mitigate health risks.
2. Occupational Exposure
Asbestos exposure extends beyond traditional industrial settings, permeating office spaces and trailers on worksites, particularly in manufacturing, construction, refineries, shipyards, and other industries. The risk of exposure is not limited to laborers but also extends to administrators and office workers who may work in close proximity to areas with asbestos exposure.
This broad occupational risk highlights the need for stringent safety protocols, worker education, and ongoing monitoring to safeguard professionals across diverse industries from the potential health hazards associated with asbestos exposure.
3. Latency & Second-Hand Exposure
The prolonged latency period of asbestos-related diseases contributes to delayed diagnoses, with health issues arising decades after initial exposure in the 1980s and previously. Secondhand exposure is a concerning aspect, particularly for individuals working in offices adjacent to facilities with ongoing asbestos exposure.
The average latency period of 20-50 years showcases the insidious nature of asbestos-related diseases, necessitating heightened awareness, regular health screenings, and stringent workplace safety measures to address both primary and secondary exposure risks.
4. Mesothelioma Deaths
Globally, an alarming estimate of 38,400 mesothelioma deaths occurs each year, providing a stark illustration of the severe impact of asbestos exposure on public health. This statistic represents the second-most prevalent cause of death in the U.S.
Therefore, there is an urgent need for robust preventive measures, stringent regulations, and comprehensive public health initiatives to reduce the incidence of mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases, highlighting the gravity of the ongoing asbestos crisis.
5. Younger Age Exposure
The correlation between age at first exposure and the likelihood of developing asbestos-related diseases later in life is a significant concern. The younger a person was when initially exposed to asbestos, the higher the probability of developing diseases associated with asbestos exposure.
This highlights the long-term health consequences for individuals exposed at a young age, necessitating early intervention, education, and preventive measures to mitigate the impact of asbestos-related diseases.
6. Migration to Colon
Asbestos fibers, initially lodged in the respiratory system, can migrate to the colon, leading to the development of cancer. This migration highlights the systemic health implications of asbestos exposure, extending beyond respiratory issues to potentially life-threatening conditions in other organs.
Understanding the migration patterns of asbestos fibers is a testament to the complexity of health risks associated with asbestos exposure and emphasizes the need for comprehensive medical monitoring and research to address the diverse ways in which asbestos can impact the human body.
7. Changing Demographics
There is a notable shift in the demographics of asbestos-related disease patients, marked by a decrease in the average age of those affected. New patient profiles depict a concerning trend toward younger individuals, challenging the traditional notion that asbestos-related diseases primarily impact older populations.
This shift is exemplified by specific cases, such as the diagnosis of a 17-year-old with mesothelioma. The changing demographics highlight the evolving landscape of asbestos exposure and its impact on health, necessitating a nuanced approach to education, awareness, and preventive measures targeted at diverse age groups.
8. Higher Risk for Smokers
The combined effect of smoking and asbestos exposure creates a synergistic health risk, with smokers exposed to asbestos being between 50 and 90 times more likely to develop lung cancer compared to their counterparts without asbestos exposure.
This higher risk for smokers is a connection between environmental and lifestyle factors in the manifestation of asbestos-related diseases, highlighting the imperative for targeted interventions and cessation programs to address the compounding health risks faced by individuals who smoke and are exposed to asbestos.
This alarming statistic highlights the compounding dangers faced by individuals exposed to both carcinogens, bringing to light the relationship between smoking and asbestos in the development of lung cancer.
9. Underreported Deaths
The reported number of asbestos-related deaths, standing at 10,000 since 1999, is acknowledged to be an underestimation, emphasizing the magnitude of the issue and the challenges associated with accurately capturing the full extent of asbestos-related mortality.
The underreporting showcases the need for improved surveillance systems, comprehensive data collection, and heightened awareness within the medical community to ensure a more accurate representation of the impact of asbestos exposure on public health.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the mesothelioma mortality rate has been reported to be 88%, with only 12% surviving to tell the tale. Addressing underreported deaths is crucial for developing effective public health strategies and allocating resources to mitigate the ongoing consequences of asbestos exposure.
10. Asbestos Fibers in Digestive System
The migration of asbestos fibers from the lungs to the colon and digestive system adds a layer of complexity to asbestos-related diseases. This phenomenon reveals the systemic nature of asbestos exposure, as fibers not only impact respiratory health but also contribute to conditions in other vital organs.
The presence of asbestos fibers in the digestive system highlights the multifaceted health implications of asbestos exposure, requiring a comprehensive understanding of its pathways within the body. Research into the migration patterns of asbestos fibers to the digestive system is essential for developing targeted medical interventions and holistic approaches to address the diverse health risks associated with asbestos exposure.
11. Lung Cancer Risk Multiplication
Asbestos exposure, a known occupational hazard, raises the risk of developing lung cancer by five times. The hazardous impact escalates significantly with smoking, where cigarettes increase the risk tenfold.
However, the most alarming scenario occurs when an individual is both a smoker and exposed to asbestos, resulting in a fiftyfold increase in the likelihood of developing lung cancer. This synergy highlights the critical need for public health interventions and regulatory measures to address the compounding risks associated with asbestos and smoking.
12. Lung Cancer Cases
The insidious nature of asbestos is evident in its estimated sixfold contribution to lung cancer compared to malignant mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive cancer linked to asbestos exposure. Globally, mesothelioma deaths reach a staggering 38,400 per year.
These statistics emphasize the extensive health impact of asbestos, not only in causing mesothelioma but significantly contributing to the prevalence of lung cancer, reinforcing the urgency for stringent preventive measures and heightened awareness.
13. No Safe Level of Exposure
Emphasizing the gravity of asbestos exposure, there is no identified safe level, highlighting the inherent dangers associated with inhaling asbestos fibers. Researchers have determined that individuals who smoke and have a history of asbestos exposure face an extraordinary 50 to 90 times increased likelihood of developing lung cancer compared to those without asbestos exposure.
This revelation sheds light to the imperative for stringent occupational safety regulations and comprehensive public health initiatives to minimize asbestos-related health risks.
14. Asbestos Consumption Worldwide
The persistence of asbestos-related risks is further exacerbated by the increasing consumption of asbestos in developing nations, particularly in regions like Asia and Latin America. This trend poses an ongoing and substantial health threat to populations in these areas.
Despite the well-documented dangers, the rise in asbestos use emphasizes the need for concerted global efforts to raise awareness, enforce regulations, and implement safer alternatives to curb the growing health hazards associated with asbestos exposure.
15. Rates of Mesothelioma Reported Across the U.S. (State-Wise)
Between 2015 and 2019, over 15,000 individuals received a mesothelioma diagnosis in the United States. Age-adjusted rates of new cancer per 100,000 people by state, with Alaska and Maine exhibiting the highest rates at 1.3 per 100,000 – nearly double the national average of 0.7.
Conversely, Hawaii reported the lowest rate at 0.4 per 100,000. Notably, Nevada’s data is excluded due to the suppression of new mesothelioma diagnoses in CDC records.
16. Number of Deaths Reported Due to Mesothelioma (State-Wise)
Over the same period, 12,431 individuals succumbed to mesothelioma in the United States, with Delaware experiencing the highest death rate at 1.1 per 100,000 – almost twice the national average of 0.6. Conversely, Arkansas, Georgia, Hawaii, and South Dakota reported the lowest mesothelioma death rates at 0.4 per 100,000.
Despite a decrease in mesothelioma death rates nationwide since 1999, the annual death counts have risen due to population growth and the prolonged latency period of mesothelioma. Advances in treatment have contributed to an increase in the five-year survival rate from just over six percent to twelve percent.
17. State-Wise Comparison of The Most Exposed States to Mesothelioma
Maine leads with a new mesothelioma cancer rate of 1.3 per 100,000 and a death rate of 1.1 per 100,000. Delaware follows closely, reporting a new cancer rate of 1.2 per 100,000 and a death rate of 1.1 per 100,000.
Other states in the top 10 include Minnesota, Alaska, Washington, Louisiana, West Virginia, Idaho, Montana, and Wisconsin. These states exhibit significantly higher rates than the national averages, emphasizing localized mesothelioma prevalence.
18. States Reported to Be the Safest From Mesothelioma
Hawaii boasts the lowest mesothelioma cancer and death rates at 0.4 per 100,000. South Dakota, Arkansas, Georgia, New Mexico, Alabama, North Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, and Kentucky also report lower rates than the national averages, highlighting regional variations in mesothelioma incidence and mortality.
19. County-Wise Prevalence of Mesothelioma Deaths
Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, stands out as having the highest new mesothelioma cancer rate (2.6 per 100,000) and the second-highest death rate (2.1 per 100,000) in the United States.
Other counties in the top 10, such as Jackson County, Mississippi, Kitsap County, Washington, New London County, Connecticut, Gloucester County, New Jersey, Butler County, Pennsylvania, York County, Maine, Camden County, New Jersey, Somerset County, New Jersey, and Niagara County, New York, exhibit rates at least double the national averages, shedding light on localized mesothelioma hotspots.
Conclusion
The prevalence of this aggressive malignancy, primarily linked to asbestos exposure, is a persistent global health concern. As highlighted by alarming statistics, mesothelioma cases are on the rise, with certain regions, such as Alaska and Maine, experiencing a concerning uptick. This highlights the urgent need for heightened awareness, rigorous research, and effective medical interventions to tackle this growing public health crisis.
The multifaceted impact of mesothelioma is evident in the diverse dimensions explored in this article. From the pervasive presence of asbestos in buildings to the shifting demographics of those affected, the long latency period, and the connection with smoking, each aspect contributes to the complexity of addressing and preventing asbestos-related diseases.
While the gravity of mesothelioma’s impact is undeniable, there is a ray of hope for those affected. Asbestos-related cancer victims have avenues for seeking justice and support through trusts, lawsuits, and disability claims.
Veterans and individuals eligible for social security benefits have potential avenues for assistance. The team at AsbestosClaims.Law is an excellent information source as well as a dedicated group of lawyers ready to help you get the compensation you deserve. Whether you are looking for individual litigation or want to join a trust, we are here to help. Call us today to see how we can help!
