Español 
English 
Volver al Blog de AsbestosFact: Asbestos, a toxic substance with no known half-life, shares some unsettling similarities with what are often referred to as “forever chemicals,” such as PFAS. While they are not the same, both present persistent public health and environmental challenges that are expected to linger with us for a long time, if not forever.
Asbestos is not a forever chemical in the traditional sense, but the incredible persistence of asbestos poses an ongoing health problem that isn’t going away.
What exactly are “forever chemicals,” though, and how does asbestos fit into this complex environmental landscape? Which is more dangerous – PFAS or asbestos? There are countless questions that are likely to come to mind regarding both.
In this article, we will take a closer look at both asbestos and forever chemicals to better understand their properties, the risks they pose, and the environmental concerns both present.
Understanding Forever Chemicals
“Forever chemicals” is a term commonly used to describe per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).[1] These synthetic chemicals are known for their exceptional durability, resistance to degradation, and bioaccumulative properties and are therefore classified as persistent organic pollutants.[2] This means that PFAS can persist in the environment for an extended period of time, earning them the moniker “forever chemicals.”
In recent years, concerns over PFAS contamination in drinking water, soil, and food have grown, prompting increased scrutiny and regulatory actions. These substances have been linked to a range of health issues, including developmental, reproductive, and immune system problems.
The following is an overview of forever chemicals’ properties:
· Exceptional Durability: PFAS compounds are engineered to be extraordinarily durable. They are designed with unique molecular structures that make them highly resistant to heat, water, and various environmental stressors. This resilience is what allows them to persist in the environment (perhaps indefinitely).
· Resistance to Degradation: One of the defining characteristics of PFAS is their resistance to degradation. Unlike many other chemicals, which break down or decompose over time, PFAS compounds remain remarkably stable, retaining their chemical structure even when subjected to environmental factors that typically cause breakdown.
· Bioaccumulation: Perhaps the most concerning aspect of PFAS is their bioaccumulative nature. These compounds have the ability to accumulate in the tissues of living organisms, including humans, over time. When PFAS enter the environment, they can find their way into food chains, ultimately posing risks to human health through consumption of contaminated food and water.
· Health Concerns: The persistence and bioaccumulation of PFAS in the environment have raised serious health concerns. Exposure to PFAS has been linked to various diseases such as developmental issues, reproductive problems, immune system dysfunction, and an increased risk of certain cancers. Such health concerns have led to heightened awareness and regulatory actions to mitigate PFAS contamination.[3]
Examples of PFAS Contamination
PFAS contamination has made headlines globally, drawing attention to its widespread presence and impact. Some notable examples of PFAS contamination include:
1. Flint, Michigan: In addition to the city’s well-documented lead contamination crisis, Flint has faced PFAS concerns. Contaminated firefighting foam used at a nearby Air National Guard base was found to have leached into the city’s water supply, compounding the community’s water quality challenges.
2. Hoosick Falls, New York: This small town in upstate New York faced a significant PFAS contamination issue linked to a nearby manufacturing facility. The contamination raised concerns about the safety of drinking water and led to community-wide efforts to address the problem.
3. Military Bases: PFAS contamination has been a significant issue on military bases around the world due to the historic use of firefighting foam containing PFAS. The Department of Defense has been addressing PFAS contamination at numerous sites, acknowledging the impact on local communities and the environment.[4]
Some examples of forever chemicals include, but are not limited to:
1. Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA): PFOA has been used in the manufacturing of non-stick cookware, waterproof fabrics, and firefighting foam. It has been associated with various health concerns and has been phased out of production in some countries.
2. Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid (PFOS): PFOS was used in stain-resistant coatings for textiles and carpets, as well as in firefighting foam. It is known for its bioaccumulative properties and has been the subject of regulatory actions.
3. Perfluorononanoic Acid (PFNA): PFNA is another PFAS compound found in products like food packaging and firefighting foam. It is of concern due to its potential health effects and environmental persistence.
4. Perfluorohexane Sulfonate (PFHxS): PFHxS has been used in various industrial processes and consumer products, including stain-resistant coatings and cleaning agents. It is known to accumulate in the environment.
5. Perfluorodecanoic Acid (PFDA): PFDA was used in the production of certain types of plastics and textiles. Like other PFAS, it is resistant to degradation and has been found in the environment.
6. GenX: GenX is a replacement chemical for PFOA and PFOS in some applications. It has faced scrutiny due to its potential health and environmental risks, leading to regulatory measures.
Many of these chemicals have been phased out or restricted due to their persistence and associated health and environmental concerns.
An Overview of Asbestos: A Different but Persistent Threat
Asbestos is not classified as a “forever chemical” like PFAS, but it shares some key traits. For one, it’s a naturally occurring mineral that, like PFAS, resists degradation over time. It has a unique ability to withstand heat, fire, and chemical damage, making it once a sought-after material in various industries.
One of the most concerning aspects of asbestos is its lack of a known half-life. In the world of environmental science, a substance’s half-life is the time it takes for half of the initial amount of that substance to decay or otherwise break down. In the case of asbestos, having no known half-life means its durability can stand the test of time.
Tipos de asbestos
Asbestos comes in various forms, each with its own properties and health risks. Some common types include chrysotile, amosite, and crocidolite. These minerals have been used in construcción, aislamiento, and manufacturing, exposing countless individuals to asbestos-related health risks.
Comparison
Health Implications
Both asbestos and PFAS have been associated with severe health problems. Asbestos exposure is linked to enfermedades relacionadas con el asbesto such as mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis. Similarly, PFAS exposure has been associated with a range of health issues, including cancer, thyroid disease, and immune system dysfunction.
Environmental Concerns
Another parallel between asbestos and PFAS is the potential to contaminate the environment. Asbestos fibers can become airborne, posing a risk to those in close vicinity. Additionally, asbestos-containing materials can release fibers into the soil and water, further contributing to environmental contamination.[5]
In a recent example, during the Hawaii fires, the Department of Health issued a warning, urging residents to take precautions against inhaling or swallowing ash from burning debris. This ash was suspected to contain harmful substances, including asbestos, underlining the ongoing environmental threat posed by asbestos.
Exposición al asbesto ambiental
Environmental asbestos exposure is a pressing issue that demands attention. Efforts to limit or contain its use and contamination are vital. While asbestos is not classified as a “forever chemical,” its persistence in the environment and its detrimental health effects emphasize the need for comprehensive measures to address this ongoing challenge.
Comparison Overview
Here’s a table showcasing the key similarities and differences between forever chemicals and asbestos:
| Characteristic | “Forever Chemicals” (PFAS) | El asbesto |
| Definition | Synthetic chemicals with exceptional durability and bioaccumulative properties. | A naturally occurring mineral. |
| Persistence | Extremely persistent, resist natural degradation processes. | Highly durable and resistant to wear and tear. |
| Bioaccumulation | Accumulate in living organismsand food chains. | Does not bioaccumulate in the same way. |
| Health Implications | Linked to developmental, reproductive, and immune system problems, and cancer. | Linked to lung disease, various cancers, asbestosis and other health complications. |
| Environmental Impact | Contaminate drinking water, soil, and food sources. | Can contaminate air and water, posing risks to both human and environmental health. |
| Examples of Contamination | Flint, Michigan water crisis, Hoosick Falls, New York, military bases worldwide. | Asbestos contamination can be found in various workplaces, buildings, and industrial sites as well as military bases. |
| Regulatory Actions | Increasing regulatory scrutiny and measures to address PFAS contamination. | Stringent regulations exist to govern asbestos use and removal. |
Final Words
While asbestos is not a “forever chemical” like PFAS, it shares some concerning characteristics, including durability and resistance to degradation. Both substances pose significant public health and environmental challenges that require continued monitoring, regulation, and remediation efforts.
As we strive to protect against “forever chemicals” like PFAS, let us not forget the persistent threat of asbestos and the importance of addressing exposure to safeguard against health and environmental consequences.
[1] https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/pfc/index.cfm
