Asbestos Lung Cancer Lawyers

Finding the Right Asbestos Lung Cancer Lawyer

Asbestos exposure causes several kinds of lung cancer. Mesotelioma is perhaps the worst disease in this group. A tumor gradually develops in the meso lining which separates the heart from the lungs. When we say gradually, that’s what we mean. Mesothelioma’s latency period could be more than fifty years. Since these victims show no serious symptoms, doctors usually don’t perform appropriate diagnostic tests.

Mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer: receiving compensation quickly is vital.

As a result, by the time a doctor detects mesothelioma, the tumor may not respond to traditional treatments. Radiation therapy is a good example. Usually, doctors use targeted radiation to shrink tumors prior to surgical removal. But, mesothelioma tumors are so close to two vital organs that high radiation doses are a bad idea. They cause too much collateral damage.

The medical issues related to asbestos and lung cancer are only the beginning. These claims are very complex, from a legal standpoint. So, although there are thousands of lawyers who would happily handle a mesothelioma claim, only a select few have the right qualifications to successfully resolve your claim.

What to Expect in a Legal Claim for an Asbestos Disease

Lung cancer and mesothelioma claims, lawsuits and asbestos bankruptcy trusts

Trust fund claims, defective product claims, and negligence claims are the three major options in an asbestos lung cancer matter. Each approach has some pros and cons.

Beginning around 1980, dozens of asbestos providers declared bankruptcy rather than face defective product lawsuits. A federal court granted their petitions, but only after these companies agreed to create a settlement fund. Today, that settlement fund exceeds $30 billion.

Receiving compensation for asbestos injuries, without a lawsuit. (Proving your case)

Trust fund claims are somewhat straightforward, from a legal standpoint. The defunct company obviously doesn’t challenge the claim on its merits. Financially, things are different. Trust fund administrators are usually a stingy lot. 

The more compensation they award, the sooner the trust fund runs out of money. Customarily, the asbestos trust fund administrator only offers pennies on the dollar, at least initially.

If the company is still in business, or it was acquired by another company, a defective product claim might be a good alternative. Scientists linked asbestos with health problems around 1900. Nevertheless, companies kept using this mineral, mostly because it was so cheap. Since these companies intentionally disregarded a known risk, and the victim’s injuries are norally so severe, juries often award very high compensation in these matters.

But these cases are legally complex. These companies usually hire teams of lawyers who fight these claims tooth and nail. These companies know that a single loss could open the floodgates and expose the company to millions of dollars in liability judgements.

Negligence claims against property owners are in the middle, from a legal and financial standpoint. Legally, victims must prove fault, but the standard of evidence is rather low. Financially, juries normally don’t award punitive damages in these cases. But they do usually award full compensatory damages for things like medical bills, lost wages, and emotional distress.

If the company is still in business, or it was acquired by another company, a defective product claim might be a good alternative. Scientists linked asbestos with health problems around 1900. Nevertheless, companies kept using this mineral, mostly because it was so cheap. Since these companies intentionally disregarded a known risk, and the victim’s injuries are norally so severe, juries often award very high compensation in these matters.

But these cases are legally complex. These companies usually hire teams of lawyers who fight these claims tooth and nail. These companies know that a single loss could open the floodgates and expose the company to millions of dollars in liability judgements.

Negligence claims against property owners are in the middle, from a legal and financial standpoint. Legally, victims must prove fault, but the standard of evidence is rather low. Financially, juries normally don’t award punitive damages in these cases. But they do usually award full compensatory damages for things like medical bills, lost wages, and emotional distress.